Posts Tagged ‘Scranton’

Charles Riddle Lectures to Entrepreneurship Class at Wilkes University

Monday, May 9th, 2011

Wilkes Barre, PA – Charles Riddle of Riddle Patent Law, Scranton, PA spoke on patents, trademarks, and copyrights.

Patent Attorney Charles L. Riddle Weighs in on Patent Reform

Thursday, April 7th, 2011

Northeast Pennsylvania Business Journal, April 2011 – Charles L. Riddle of Riddle Patent Law, Scranton provides his opinion on the patenting process in the United States. The full article is available here. Riddle Patent Law Article

Riddle Patent Law, Scranton, Trademark, Copyright

Riddle Patent Law, Scranton, Trademark, Copyright

Charles L. Riddle to Lecture on Patents to IEEE Student Branch at The University of Scranton

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

April 7, 2011 – Patent Attorney Charles L. Riddle will provide a short lecture to the IEEE Student Branch of the University of Scranton. The lecture will focus on Attorney Riddle’s experience as an engineering major, and patent law in general.

Trademark Cancellation Proceeding Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

MAD ELF vs. RUDE ELF’S REDERVE – Battle of the Microbrews

Troegs Brewing of Harrisburg, PA has petitioned the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel the trademark registration of Fegley Brew Works of Allentown. Because the federal courts have primary jurisdiction over a trademark registration matter, it is prudent to consider filing an action in the federal court and suspending the proceeding before the Trademark Board. The client’s needs and financial resources may dictate how the case should proceed.

If you choose to first conduct the cancellation proceeding before the Trademark Office, you will get a second bite at the apple at the federal court level. This is because the trademark administrative proceedings (oppositions and cancellations) are appealable to the federal courts. The standard of review is de novo – a new case – like hitting the reset button on the decision.

Another factor to consider is that the Trademark Trail and Appeal Board (TTAB) only has the power to decide whether the trademark should be registered. The TTAB has no power to stop a party from using a trademark, or to award damages for trademark infringement. Accordingly, if the client is selling product under the mark, and the client loses the TTAB, the other party will likely file a second case in the federal courts to obtain damages and injunctive relief. If you win at the TTAB, the other party may take the appeal. In either instance, the client faces re-litigating the entire case a second time at twice the cost.

Typically the determinative factor of whether to suspend the TTAB case and file a federal action is litigation cost. As discussed above, there are two bites at the litigation apple: one at TTAB level, and the other in the federal courts. Once these cases start, they are extremely difficult to stop without giving up rights. As of 2009, the average cost of an opposition / cancellation proceeding before the trademark office is around $100,000. Ask any client if they want to spend $100,000 on an administrative proceeding that only decides registrability of a trademark application, and they will likely say no. Then tell the client that it is highly likely that an infringement litigation will happen over the same trademarks to resolve the remaining issues – to the tune of an additional $290,000 (average cost).

While there are valid reasons to continue with the proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, they are few. More often than not, it is economically prudent to advise the client of the cost saving option of taking the dispute out of the hands of the TTAB by filing a federal court action.

Trademark Registration

Monday, October 11th, 2010

Trademark Regstration

Patent Grant / Marcus Howard & Donna Harvey, Philadelphia, PA

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

U.S. Patent No. 7,753,280 for Personal Bank Card Storage Device and Method of Use.

Patent Drawing

Patent Drawing

Riddle Patent Law Acts as Local Counsel for Jack Thorpe in Thorpe V. Borough of Jim Thorpe, Pending Before the Middle District of Pennsylvania

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Find the NPR story here. . . .

NPR News Story – Jim Thorpe

The Business Incubator at the Scranton Enterprise Center

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

The Scranton Business Incubator provides assistance to new businesses.  Here is a piece from their site:

Q.  What is the advantage of locating within the business incubator?

A.  There are many ways that a small business can benefit from locating within a business incubator. First, by sharing common costs associated with a running a business, the Business Incubator reduces the occupancy expenses for the business and therefore, the business has additional capital to utilize for development purposes. Secondly, the business will have access to several business development tools such as networking opportunities, mentoring programs and financial assistance. The business environment created by a business incubator is one that is conducive to the growth of businesses and the entrepreneurs who run them.

For more information visit Scranton Enterprise Center – The Business Incubator.

Attorney Charles L. Riddle ’97 to Guest Lecture at Wilkes University

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

Charles Riddle will be speaking to the undergraduate Feasibility Analysis class on March 30, 2009 – providing insight into his practice as an intellectual property attorney.

He will briefly discuss the legal theory of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets and how they translate into a competitive advantage asset in business.

He will also discuss his experiences with individual inventors, businesses and universities of the Northeast Pennsylvania, Scranton / Wilkes Barre region.

For more information, and inquire about attending the lecture contact:
Ellen Raineri, Ph.D.
The Jay Sidhu School of Business and Leadership
Wilkes University

wilkes university logo